Speaking of Sci Fi, Chicago's own SciFiDaily.blogspot.com noted that the "Battlestar Galactica" DVD box set that is currently on sale exclusively at Best Buy is not the only version of the set in the works. "Universal will release a universal box set (that was a good pun, wasn't it?) on Sept. 20… the universal box contains much, much more."
Al Gore's new TV channel, Current, debuts Monday. The FAQ page of the Web site for the network is kind of funny, in an arch, know-it-all way (Question: "I suppose [the focus on current events] means there will be no cartoons." Answer: "Actually, we lurrrve animation. It's got to fit with our mission -- i.e. more JibJab than `Teen Titans' -- but if it does, we are hot to have it." Hey, why are the gratuitous dismissal of "Teen Titans"? That was uncalled for. And it's not like every JibJab video is funny.
There are some verrry interesting rumors about the casting for the next season of "Survivor" on RealityBlurred.com/realitytv (if you really want to know, click the "Survivor" button on that page).
Several readers wrote to say that the Pets.com sock puppet dog is actually starring in those 1-800-Bar-None ads. Same dog, hence the Bar None tagline about getting a "second chance." But the microphone-wielding dog is not, as a few correspondents pointed out, voiced by Michael Ian Black any more.
Judging by my mailbag, there are mixed feelings about the new season of "The 4400": Some felt it was "going strange" and "much too sloooooooow moving" but there were those who thought it was "still a very good show." I think it's still watchable, just not as great as last year.
Amy Amatangelo's readers have spoken too: She's got her annual readers poll up on her TV Gal site, where readers voted "Marissa is a lesbian on `The O.C.'" and "Rory quits Yale on `Gilmore Girls'" tops in the category entitled: "I Wouldn't Buy That If It Was on Sale, or Worst Story Line or Plot Twist."
And apparently, his "I'm a 12-year-old goofball" approach is a hit: According to the Internet firm Lycos, as of July 23, Milonakis' name was the 34th most-popular search on the Web.
"People hate change; we knew we'd be fighting against that. They miss the couch and the globe," Karlin says. "But I happen to be a person who is a fierce advocate of not getting comfortable. As long as the content of the show remains sharp and interesting," people will get used to the new chair perched next to Stewart's desk. The couch, Karlin adds, was a holdover from older, pre-Stewart versions of the "Daily Show," which sort of tried to ape the typical late-night talk-show vibe.
"It's funny to us -- we have no attachment to the couch," Karlin said. "The couch is so incongruous with the show. … One thing that's been made really clear over the last few years is that it's not a talk show. We don't know what it is. It's a thing unto itself."
And for now, it's a thing that's been invaded by three huge video screens, which loom over Stewart like … really huge looming things.
"We haven't figured out how to use them yet," Karlin admits. "It's like anything else, when you get a new computer, you know it has all these cool features, but you haven't figured it out, so you just use Word. That's where we are with the new set. It's just a process of discovery. We're a little freaked out about it, but we're excited about what we can do with the new space."
"The Daily Show" doubled the size of the live audience with the move, Karlin noted. "We've been in a small, intimate studio for such a long time that we wanted to see what it would be like to bring in more people and have that awkward feeling when jokes don't work. You really want a large, cavernous space for that awkwardness."
Karlin is so over the couch that he admits he's not 100 percent sure of where it is. "We did have a plan to have a ritual cleansing and then destroy stuff" from the old set, but, for reasons he can't quite explain, "all that got destroyed was the fax machine."
"I think [the couch] is being auctioned off for some charity," Karlin said. "Anyway, let's say that; it sounds good."
More from Ben Karlin:
[On the show's new digs] "The square footage [in the new space] is almost twice what we had before. So we thought it would be kind of dumb to take exactly the same set. One thing led to another, and now we have these three big screens.
"We've moved to a worse part of town. And we have windows. So now, you look out and see a level of homelessness that you should really not be staring at while you're trying to write a joke about Dick Cheney.
[On how guests feel about the lack of a sofa] "We want people to be comfortable. We have a blend of guests from entertainment, politics, journalists, and with the exception of straight-up actors, all of them do a lot of talk shows with sets like ours, things like 'Meet the Press' and the CNN shows. They're used to being in all manner of settings, it's not a big deal for them. It might be more strange if we only had people like Jessica Simpson too.
[On having lots of authors on the show of late] "We don't really have to be subservient to that publicity machine of films and TV shows. People can go other places to see Johnny Knoxville talk about 'The Dukes of Hazzard.' On the flip side, authors might not get exposed to our type of audience, so it's nice to give them a forum. We want to keep [the roster of guests] an interesting mix, that's all.
[On the first day of the new set, the screens behind Stewart featured the words "The Daily Show" in small type, which looked … odd] "But when you look at it on an architect's sketch, it looks so cool. It just didn't work at all [on the show]. For that first show [with the new set], we had one day to rehearse. We were still loading the place and moving stuff, and we had a show to do. They were still constructing the offices, we were really going up to the last minute. There were still wires and scaffolding everywhere. It was a big job, but it's good for a show that's approaching middle age in TV years. It's nice to have a new thing to play with.
"But it's weird to go down [to the set] and focus on something that is not the content of the show.
[On the decision to shake things up] "Well, we got some political capital in the election, and we're gonna spend it" [laughs].
Adam Finley of TVSquad.com perfectly captured a thought I've had many times while watching soaps. "The most horrifying thing I've ever experienced is tuning into a soap opera I have not seen or thought about in over a decade, and every one of the actors looks exactly the same. I know it's due to plastic surgery, Botox, drinking the ocular fluid of a peacock, or whatever the [heck] celebrities do to look younger, but [darn,] is it scary. When I flip to 'One Life to Live' and Asa Buchanan actually looks younger than when I last saw him in 1992, I feel as if I'm no longer on Earth, but instead have been taken to some surreal new level of hell."
Jeannie Sanke of Evanston (who's descended from Mitchells, Aitkens, MacGregors and Richfords) wrote regarding a tribute to "Star Trek" actor James Doohan I penned earlier in the week: "I would wholeheartedly agree with every point you made about Cmdr. Scott, save one: as a Scot, and with a family full of Scots back home in Glasgow, I can tell you that Jimmy Doohan's Scottish accent was terrible and only grew worse over time. Not that I loved him any less. But it really was off, for those of us who know the difference. Why, in 'Relics,' he sounded downright North American half the time!"
Aye, I canna lie. Sanke has a point.
Is it me, or is the microphone-wielding dog in the "1-800-Bar-None" car-finance ads a dead ringer for the Pets.com sock-puppet dog of years gone by?
The best reality development in ages (aside from the cable repeats of "Survivor" and "The Amazing Race" this summer) is that "Project Runway" winner Jay McCarroll will get his own Bravo special, "Project Jay," which will follow his attempt to launch his own fashion line. There's no air date for the Bravo special, but you can be sure I'll let you know when it's on.
Speaking of "Survivor," the most recent winner of the reality show, Tom Westman, has retired from firefighting and is looking to become a motivational speaker, according to the New York Daily News. But first, he'll make an appearance on the CBS soap "The Bold and the Beautiful" Aug. 10. "He appears in scenes with series regular Lorenzo Lamas, who plays Hector Ramirez, a Los Angeles firefighter," according to the CBS press release. Sounds hot!
Speaking of hot, there's an open casting call for female beauties and male geeks for the next edition of "Beauty and the Geek" from 4 to 8 p.m. July 31 at the Lincoln Park branch of the John Barleycorn tavern empire.
Do you have any thoughts on this season of "The 4400"? For me, the quality is wavering a bit, though I still watch it religiously. Anyhow, drop me a line if you have any feedback on this season of the USA Network show.
My Tribune colleague Shia Kapos this week that a Chicago-area family, the Rosiers, were so unhappy with the work done on their home by a "Renovate My Family" crew that they're suing the company that created the show. It's a shame that the family had a bad experience, but the whole debacle is somehow made worse by the fact that it was all in pursuit of a terrible show. "Renovate" is a boring (and now-canceled) "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition" ripoff starring Dr. Phil's son (who was more wooden than a 2-by-4). And however lame you think it must have been based on that description - trust me, as one of the three people in America to have seen it, "Renovate" was even worse than it sounded.
That was fast: The first season of "House," the Fox medical drama starring the Emmy-nominated Hugh Laurie, comes to DVD Aug. 30.
It's not just because "Beam me up, Scotty," became a legendary pop-culture catch-phrase.
It's because we identified with the exuberant chief engineer that Doohan created. Scotty was the working stiff. He was not one of the exalted beings lording over the bridge of the Enterprise. No, he was the overworked guy in engineering, the sweaty, busy guy in charge of keeping the darn thing running.
Who hasn't been there? The boss says, "I need you to do this Herculean task now. In fact, I needed it yesterday. Why haven't you finished yet?"
And you nod your head and say, "Sure, no problem." Even as the sweat breaking out on your brow leaves the distinct impression that you really don't know how you're going to do whatever impossible job you've just agreed to do.
Not that the bigwigs see your sweat. They're off to the next Hugely Important Decision, the next crisis, the next alien babe.
You're left getting the ship underway again within an hour. Good thing you told the boss that you'd need three!
That's what a smart worker does -- give the boss a somewhat realistic idea of how long the job will take ("You'll have it on your desk in the morning!"), knowing that the boss'll want it sooner ("End of business today, got that?"). Even though you know that, if you really buckled down and got cracking, you could get it done by about 4:30 p.m. and still have time for a Starbucks break.
That's what Scotty represented -- the cunning intelligence of the grunt worker. Do the impossible enough times and your bosses will take it for granted. Scotty did the impossible time and again, and always tweaked things just a little bit so that he'd come out looking good.
But he wasn't devious or shiftless. The Enterprise was his first priority and his only love. Scotty was just a guy who, like us, had to figure out on the fly how to manage the expectations of the muckety-mucks.
"But Captain, she can't take it!" he'd yell in that Scottish burr of his, as Captain Kirk tried yet another crazy maneuver with Scotty's beloved ship.
But she could and did take it, because Scotty was there to fix the warp plasma manifolds or whatever and make it all run smoothly again.
It's the Scottys of this world who keep it running. And that's why we loved him. Because he was one of us.
Godspeed, Mr. Doohan. Thanks for doing that Scottish accent so well. Most of all, thanks for giving us working stiffs someone to root for.
Oak Park resident Manning Peterson was shaken when a loud confrontation between "agitated" people occurred recently outside his home, which is close to where Oak Park resident and University of Illinois at Chicago professor Peter D'Agostino was murdered just days before. It turns out the loud altercation was part of filming for an upcoming episode of "Trading Spaces."
" 'That was great! Totally believable!' says (I assume) the director of the TV show," Peterson wrote in the Wednesday Journal. 'You think this is funny?' I ask the crew. 'Do you realize a man was murdered here, three days ago?' 'No …,' says a crew member, annoyed, as if he was tired of hearing about it, 'it wasn't here; it was on the next street.'"
The Wednesday Journal also reported that the homeowners who participated in filming of the episode, which a TLC spokesperson told the paper is tentatively set to air Sept. 10, are "associated with Noble Fool, an improv comedy troupe."
Reader Stephanie Kuenn of Chicago wrote in to make a case for Comedy Central's oddball new comedy, "Stella," which I didn't find funny but she did: "I liked the absurdity most of all. My husband and I were watching the second show, and he said, 'Is this just going to be about their apartment building?' To me, it's taking a typical concept, like 'Friends' and then applying physical comedy and non-sequiturs to it, and I wasn't expecting that. I did like the dance sequence they performed to win acceptance into the co-op."
Amy Amatangelo, Zap2It.com's "TV Gal" columnist, had a great idea for the next edition of "Beauty and the Geek": "I'm … crossing my fingers that … we'll have male beauties and female geeks and see how that all works out. My general thinking is that the men wouldn't be nearly as kind and supportive as the gals have been this season, but I would love to be proven wrong."
Speaking of Comedy Central, the network has aquired syndication rights to "Scrubs" and will start airing the stellar comedy in 2006.
According to an online report, Michelle Forbes of "Homicide" and "Star Trek: The Next Generation" will guest on "Battletar Galactica" [SPOILER AHEAD -- DON'T READ THE REST OF THIS ITEM IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW MORE] as an admiral who assumes command of the fleet. (Warning: There's another really major spoiler about Forbes' character on the site, so don't click on the link above unless you simply have to know more.)
Unsatisfied with the reality offerings on TV these days? There are yet more creative permutations of unscripted fare at www.alldaycoffee.net/toys/reality.php, where you can find a "reality show premise generator."
A few months ago, I did e-mail interviews with "Battlestar" writers David Weddle and Bradley Thompson, who wrote the two-parter that opens Season 2. Readers passed on some questions for the duo, who kindly responded promptly, but I never posted their replies (bad me!). Anyway, here they are the questions and answers:
From a reader named Rick, question 1: "Are there any plans to tell new, updated stories of classic episodes, such as 'The Living Legend' dealing with Commander Cain (Lloyd Bridges) and the Battlestar Pegasus, or dealing with the 'Eastern Alliance' and Count Iblis (played by Patrick McNee). My friends and I think an actor like Michael Ironside would make a fantastic Commander Cain, matching up with and against Edward James Olmos's Adama."
Weddle and Thompson: "All I can tell you is that we have talked about Pegasus. Whether she will appear is still (sorry about the pun) up in the air. There is, however, no way to top Mr. Bridges' performance, so we'd be looking for a way to take a Pegasus encounter in a different direction." (Recent news reports have Michelle Forbes as the new Pegasus chief in upcoming episodes).
From Emily, question 2: "Will we see more of the everyday people who've happened to survive the Holocaust? Maybe people who aren't necessarily immediately connected to the Galactica, who are just trying to survive?"
Weddle and Thompson: "We hope to. We've written scenes like that, but usually they're the first ones to get cut when we find out the show is too long to fit the time slot. But we'll continue to look for ways to explore what life is like for all the people in the fleet, because we find it fascinating. What kind of economy has developed? What are all those lawyers doing now?
"In 'Colonial Day,' Tom Zarek pointed to a gardener who still came to work every day, despite the fact that the whole world he functioned within is gone. And Zarek took over bartending chores because he didn't believe that his money would benefit the person behind the bar. We're always looking for ways that we can glimpse the life of the everyday people in the fleet, but so far, we haven't been able to concentrate on it.
"A lot of this is because of the economics of the show. For example, it costs us more to set up new ships or new locations than it does to use the ones that are already standing on the sound stage. We have a bunch of talented actors we're paying to show up every week, and we have stories for all of them that end up being shorted for time... so you can see that doing stories about new people falls way down on the priority list.
"But the struggles of the ordinary people in the fleet intrigue us as well, and when we can find ways for the Galactica family to cross paths with them, we'll leap at the opportunity."
July 8, 2005 9:28 PM CDT: 'Dancing' questions, 'Amazing' news
If you're a fan of "The Amazing Race," you're in luck. The cable network GSN will begin broadcasting all eight seasons of the show, in order, on a nightly basis starting at 8 p.m. Monday.
"There are tons of people who came to this show in later seasons, and they've never seen these [early] episodes, because unlike dramas, reality shows don't usually repeat and don't hit syndication as quickly," said Linda Holmes, an attorney from Bloomington, Minn., who, under the moniker Miss Alli, has recapped every season of "TAR" for the Web site TelevisionWithoutPity.com. "For people who missed those seasons, it's like an entire new season of the show is airing in the middle of the summer. It's a huge thing for fans of the show who came in late."
More from my e-mail dialogue with Linda Holmes, Television Without Pity's "Miss Alli":
Q. Do you think the first few seasons of "The Amazing Race" were different from the most recent couple of seasons? If so, how so?
A. Yeah, I do. I think the show was more of a standout early on in the sense that it really did cast relatively normal, functional people, and didn't fill the cast with ugly arguing. Unfortunately, that has changed somewhat in later seasons. Season 7 wasn't nearly as bad as Seasons 5 and 6 for ugliness, but there's much more warmth, I think, in the first two or three seasons. The clues have also gotten easier in later seasons, in that they don't have `clues' these days as much as pieces of paper that say `Go here.'-"
Q. Do you like earlier seasons more than more recent seasons of "TAR"?
A. That's a tough one. I'm a huge fan of season 1, not a huge fan of 2, a huge fan of 3 except for Flo, bored by 4, mostly happy with 5 with reservations, kind of grossed out by 6, and kind of fascinated by 7. It's been up and down, and I tend to like specific teams and episodes more than entire seasons.
Q. How do you think fans that began watching the show in its later seasons might respond to the first couple of seasons?
A. I actually have some friends who have done this very thing -- picked up old recorded episodes from `TAR 1' or `TAR 2' after jumping in at [Seasons] 5 or 6 when the show really hit. Mostly, they've totally loved the early seasons. I think if you like it now, you're going to like it then. It's not a show that I think took very long to find its feet.
Q. What are your thoughts on the first couple seasons' casts, as opposed to more recent casts? It seems to me there are more "model/actor" types in recent seasons than in earlier ones, though I haven't seen the first two seasons so maybe I'm wrong about that.
A. There were always models, but I think it's true that there are more now, and also that they tend to reference them as models more. I think Brandon and Nicole in Season 5, for instance, were called `Dating Models' in lieu of being called `Dating Christians,' quite frankly, which I think was their real niche. Lots of people in the world have modeled. `Models' tends to mean they can't think of anything else to say about you.
But yeah, I think the first couple of seasons were a little bit less pretty as far as casting, or at least the pretty people were broken up with more normal people. Which isn't to say some of the gorgeous people aren't also wonderful -- the idea that better-looking people are inherently less interesting than ugly people is one of my least favorite reality-show myths.
DANCING DAYS: Don't you think John O'Hurley and Charlotte Jorgensen were robbed on ABC's "Dancing With the Stars?" I do. They should have won. Fine, Kelly Monaco can do a handstand, so what? O'Hurley and Jorgensen had class and style and, dangit, they had fun out on the dance floor. And am I a conspiracy theorist for wondering why Monaco, who just happens to be the star of an ABC soap, got a perfect score for her last dance, despite the fact that her partner nearly dropped her at the end of the number? Please.
Well, regardless, I'll tune in when the show comes back -- which it most certainly will, since a whopping 22 million viewers tuned in for Wednesday's "Dancing" finale.
TV-ON-DVD BONANZA: Why aren't folks dropping as much cash at movie theaters these days? The question has entertainment-industry folks in a frenzy, but I'd say it's fairly easily explained.
I, for one, would rather sit home sit at home and watch "Freaks and Geeks" or "The Wire" on DVD than try to find a movie theater that's playing a movie with actual dialogue (not just explosions) and isn't full of people talking or crunching in my ear.
I'm not alone in those sentiments, apparently. Variety reports that in 2004, consumers spent some $2.8 billion on TV-on-DVD, which is the fastest-growing segment of the DVD market.
And just by the way, if you're a "Battlestar" fan too, my interview with Jamie Bamber (Apollo) is here, and check back Friday for interviews with Katee Sackhoff, Mary McDonnell and Edward James Olmos. There's other "Battlestar' goodness aplenty here and here.
If you're some kind of alien freak who does not appreciate these shows (and if so, what exactly is your problem?), you can skip all the interviews and go on the the next Watcher item by clicking here.
[Last time we talked, Browder said his biggest priority when he got to the "Stargate SG-1" set was to figure out where the bathrooms are. He reports success on that front] I know where the john is, yeah, I can navigate myself for the most part without getting lost in the "Stargate" maze. I still have no idea what goes on in the next stage [where "Stargate Atlantis"] films, they have an alternate layout. They need to put some cheese at the end of that maze and maybe I'll figure it out.
I don't have any bad stories to tell, it's kind of exciting to have a job, and it's an exciting intellectual process to come on to a show that's going this long and sort of find your way into the process. If nothing else, it's really interesting. When you take a job with an existing cast, existing sets, producers, writers, you don't really know what you're gonna get into.
You hear stories about different sets, but a lot of times you hear them after you get there, what the problems are, and so-and-so hates so-and-so, this and that. I just haven't really encountered that here. That's not to say we're always a happy family -- I'm waiting for someone to yell at me [laughs], and we occasionally yelled on the set of "Farscape," but there was so much love and affection there too.
[On learning the ropes on the "Stargate SG-1" set] There's a certain advantage in having a person on the set who is in a perpetual state of ignorant bliss. I'm not afraid to ask the question that's been asked 100 times before [by others]. I'm a big believer in asking the stupid question, as long as you're respectful of the process. "I know all of you guys know this, but why are we doing this?" People look at you like you're crazy, but I think it's good when you've been doing something for a long period of time to have a fresh set of eyes and ears and a fresh voice come in and not try to change things but just try to figure it out.
I'm sort of familiar with the technical aspects of a sci fi show, how to do all the green-screen work and all that. The hardest thing is to learn everyone's name, when they all know each other. It's getting into the rhythm and feel of the show, the style, so that you can find your way in, so you can figure out how they work as opposed to how you used to work. "Farscape" was constructive chaos, but it was chaos we understood. They're much more efficient up here, it's a matter of getting used to the pace and the feeling of the show. It's getting to know people and learning to trust one another and getting a sense of what someone else is going to do [in a scene].
I have to say, everyone has been very, very nice up here, the cast, Michael Shanks, Chris Judge made my transition to the show very easy, Amanda Tapping didn't come on 'til the sixth episode, but those guys made my transition easy. Having Claud ["Farscape" co-star Claudia Black, who plays Vala in the first six episodes of "SG-1's" new season] here made the transition as easy as it could be. And the efficiency of the people around me kind of made it much easier to figure out how to go about this.
[On his character, Air Force pilot Cameron Mitchell, who's put in charge of the SG-1 team] Cameron Mitchell was a Western actor back in the day. He was on TV for years, he was a very recognizable face. But really, I don't know how Rob [Robert Cooper] got the name, I didn't ask. I think it's great.
From my standpoint, Mitchell's still a work in progress. Until I see the final cut and stuff goes out to the audience, I don't want to be saying who this guy is. Quite frankly, TV is a highly collaborative medium, and everyone -- the viewers, the writers, the editors, the actors, the directors -- will have a view of who the character is and what he is. I have an opinion too, but I don't want to be judged as failing to achieve what I want to achieve, so I'll let the audience make up their own minds.
[On his "Stargate SG-1" scenes with "Farscape" co-star Claudia Black] We didn't have the kind of scenes we had on "Farscape," they're really two different characters. There were none of those scenes of the two of us locked in a closet [laughs].
Claud and I know each other pretty well, it's great having her around. In front of the camera, she did such a great job of creating such a different character that there's no way I could fall into any old habits. She did a fantastic job of creating something very different [from her "Farscape" character]. So it's easy to react differently.
[On the on-set "actor's nightmare" that haunts the "SG-1" set] Craft services were not a problem on "Farscape." We had someone who came around with tea and a couple of biccys [biscuits], or cookies. Here they have this guy, Jack. He's the pusher-man. He comes around and you're thinking, "I better not eat this," and he's standing there in front of you with a tray of steaming cinnamon buns. Those are not on the approved list at the moment [laughs]. He also does this really big tray of candy. It's like, "Jack, go away!" [laughs]. It's an actor's nightmare. The clothes are a little more forgiving [on "SG-1"], but still, it is a problem.
[On the cult surrounding the "Gate Guy"/"Chevron Guy," who's played by Gary Jones] Chevron guy, there's a man with an intense following. He's been around for eight years, I don't understand why they didn't just put him in charge of SG-1. That was their first mistake.
POSTED July 7, 2005 2:30 PM CDT: A steady drumbeat of criticism has pummeled MTV all week, with critics saying the channel's coverage of the Live 8 concerts on July 2 did a disservice to music fans with its commercial and talking-head interruptions.
While allowing there were things MTV and VH1 might do differently next time the networks are faced with such a sprawling event, MTV Networks Music Group president Van Toffler offered a spirited defense of the channels' coverage of the concerts, which were designed to bring attention to African poverty and debt relief.
"Let's be clear, people turned to TV to view this event," Toffler said, offering MTV and VH1's combined ratings as proof. The two channels, which broadcast the same mixture of coverage from various concerts, snared 18 million total viewers over the course of the eight-hour concert, according to an MTV press release. "It was our highest-rated music event in years," Toffler said.
Still, Toffler told the Los Angeles Times that MTV is considering showing the concerts again.
Addressing the criticism of MTV's frequent switching between artists and concerts, Toffler said several factors were responsible for the segues. The fact that the deal between the Live 8 organizers and the MTV networks wasn't finalized until the day before the concerts meant that the channels could not go commercial-free, Toffler said. MTV had also agreed to air segments designed to educate its audience about Live 8's goals, which cut into coverage of the music performances.
"We ran two of Madonna's three songs, with the Bob Geldof introduction," Toffler said. "But we were also trying to educate people."
Toffler added that executives at the music channels decided to offer a mixture of footage from various Live 8 concerts on both MTV and VH1, instead of presenting the London concert on one channel and the Philadelphia event on another, because of concerns that MTV or VH1 audiences might not be familiar with certain artists, and because MTV execs wanted to present a broad picture of the event. And hosts talked over performances only when the coverage was about to switch to a commercial, to another artist or to an interview or educational segment, Toffler said.
"If you run all of Elton John [in London], then you miss Jay-Z and Linkin Park [in Philadelphia]," Toffler said. "We wanted to make sure we gave a full picture of what the event meant, the scope and the scale of the artists involved."
"Based on the stature of this event, the stature it took on in the last few hours [before it began], had I known what I know today, I would have tried to go commercial-free and go longer and include full sets. But that is something I only have the knowledge of now," Toffler said.
Toffler sounded aggrieved by the suggestion that MTV erred by cutting into the set by Pink Floyd, who reunited for the first time in more than 20 years for Live 8's London concert.
"We ran 20 out of 21 minutes" of Pink Floyd's set, Toffler said. "The only reason they were interrupted is that we had a local affiliate break, the cable affiliates had to go on break. It's in our agreements" [with cable companies]. "We didn't know when Pink Floyd's set was until the day of the show, and we blew through the prior commercial break" for national advertisers.
"This is what happens when you have a live show, these things happen," Toffler said. "We didn't run full sets of some artists because we would have had to lose other artists altogether. We ran only eight hours, and there were 40 to 50 hours of performances. We wanted to be equitable."
Toffler said he wished MTV's Web sites could have hosted the online presentation of the concerts, but the primary U.S. rights to the concert were snapped up by AOL early on in the Live 8 planning.
AOL saw fans flock to its Live 8 coverage, which offered seven different live feeds of the various worldwide concerts and no interruptions by hosts or commercials. AOL's Live 8 coverage garnered more than 5 million unique users on July 2, which was far more than the online service expected, and streams of the concert performances, which are still available at AOLMusic.com, continue to get millions of hits.
For its part, AOL paid Live 8 an undisclosed sum to be the primary U.S. licensee for the Live 8 broadcast; it then negotiated subsidiary rights to the MTV networks and radio outlets. The concerts themselves were funded by sponsors such as AOL, Volvo and Nokia. All worldwide visual coverage of actual performances was coordinated by a production team in London, and feeds of each concert were sent out from London to Live 8 broadcast partners worldwide.
As a "full partner" in the event, AOL had extensive links to Live 8 educational material and petitions, but the online service set things up so people could access music and information as they pleased.
"What we're finding is, in the case of our space shuttle coverage or Live 8 coverage, people are getting more sophisticated," said Jim Bankoff, executive vice president of programming and products for America Online. "They are comfortable having their own control. They don't necessarily need a whole lot of editing on top -- they want information, but they can be in control of how they consume that information. They don't necessarily need a host guiding them."
Just as the first Live Aid concert in 1985 was a turning point in the history of MTV, the Live 8 concerts marked a watershed for the online consumption of video, a development made possible by the growth of broadband Internet access.
The kudos for AOL's presentation of the Live 8 experience also dovetail nicely with the late-July relaunch and redesign of AOL.com as an online portal with lots of free content for non-subscribers.
"We knew it would be big, we didn't know it would be this big," Bankoff said. And for AOL, the best may be yet to come: Bankoff expects "by far the majority of usage" to come in the weeks before AOL takes down the Live 8 streaming video on Sept 6.
GETTING REAL: So now the "writers" for reality shows--1,000 of them, at last count--want to join the Writers Guild of America.
These writers say they do as much story creation as the next Hollywood wordsmith, and they do have a point. It's been an open secret since Day One of MTV's "The Real World" or network grandaddy "Survivor" that reality shows massage plots and create drama wherever they can.
And when what happens in the real world isn't up to snuff, there's that old standby-the post-filming dubbed dialogue (ahem, Donald Trump). Somebody has to write that stuff (and I'm assuming that monkeys strapped to typewriters refuse to work for Mark Burnett).
Of course, reality-show story editors and producers--the ones who do their darndest to make folks such as Charlie O'Connell of "The Bachelor" and the small-town wallflowers on "The Swan" seem even mildly interesting--should get more pay, health insurance and other Guild protections.
But if they want to be taken seriously as writers, maybe their work should be labeled fiction, because sometimes what gets broadcast does not even remotely reflect "reality."
One "Swan" producer told Entertainment Weekly about the process of "Frankenbiting," or editing together various sound clips to make someone say what producers want them to say. One poor husband of a "Swan" contestant was edited to sound as if he thought his wife looked "average," the magazine reported. (The producer left out the part where he called her "beautiful.")
As a fan of quality reality TV, I'm willing to accept that producers skirt the truth sometimes and massage storylines to make shows more compelling. But this Frankenbiting thing is bad news, and I hope it's not prevalent on the majority of reality shows.
Here's a fair trade: In return for making "West Wing"-style wages, in those instances where reality producers and writers are creating fiction, by golly, they should label it as such.
With "The West Wing," at least, I know what I'm getting.
July 7, 2005 10:18 AM CDT: Summer hits wrap up seasons: 'Dancing' soap star sparkles; 'Beauty' and 'geek' split $250,000 prize
ABC's runaway (or is it danceaway?) hit "Dancing With the Stars" finished its run Wednesday, with "General Hospital" actress Kelly Monaco and professional dancer Alec Mazo waltzing away with top honors.
They bested fan favorites John O'Hurley and Charlotte Jorgensen, whose elegance and chemistry couldn't beat Monaco and Mazo's amazing comeback (they scored lowest in the show's first broadcast).
And "Dancing" wasn't the only summer reality series to bow out Wednesday.
On "Beauty and the Geek," the WB's hit, Chuck Munyon and Caitilin Stoller won a shared prize of $250,000.
Final "Dancing" rankings were based on a combination of audience votes and scores from three judges, who gave the Monaco-Mazo final dance the program's only perfect score.
Who'd have thought O'Hurley, who played J. Peterman on "Seinfeld," would turn out to be such a personable dancer? He and Jorgensen, a professional dancer, made the studio audience roar with approval for their dance, set to the Pointer Sisters' "I'm So Excited."
Over on the WB, the charm of that summer hit was it didn't force the pretty girls and nerdy guys into fake relationships.
Contestants were paired platonically and competed in challenges that played off cultural stereotypes: Women had to fix cars; men had to buy outfits for the women. In the final challenge, teammates were tested on knowledge of each other. Richard Rubin fell short: He didn't know teammate Mindi Emanuel's middle name.
For those who got addicted to the show, and wondered if a relationship between geek Brad Hooker and beauty named Erika Rumsey continued beyond the program, the WB will broadcast a reunion show, "Beauty and the Geek: The Aftermath," at 7 p.m. Wednesday.
To order a reprint of this article, please
click here.